54)والری، لینسی و میل هولین، گری، 1383، گزینه های ایران در پیگیری برنامه هسته ای، ترجمه علی حسینی، همشهری ، شماره 12
1)Bunn, Georye, inspection for clandestine nuclear activites: does the npt provide legal authority for the IAEA’s proposal for reforme nuclear law bulletin
krateros, Ioannou, Nvclear energy- peace ful use, Encyclopedia of public International law- Vol- 9,1986. P390
2)Convention Relatiny to civilliability in the field of maritime carriage of nuclear materials
3)D.Fetflwck the Handbook of humanitarian law in armed conflicts, (new yourk, oxford uni press 1995 p64.
4)D.M. Edwards- International legal aspects of Nuclear weapons- Ic- L-Q- Vol 37, 1987.p4
5)David Fischer “History of International Atomic Energy Agency, the first forty years” IAEA1997 pp.183-143
6)Gold blat, jodef, Twenty years of the npt implementation and prospects, 1990,p17
57, june 1996,p21 Mason, Will Rich, the non- prolife ration treaty the micheal company law publisher, 1968.p69
7)IAEA, INFCIRC/66/Rev2, the agency’s safeguards system (1965,as provisionally extended in 1966 and 1968 genera, Distribution, 16september1968 Treaty of tlatelolco, art18
8) InternationalLaw Commission, fifty third session 2001-p66.
9) Lammv, Utilization of Nuclear Energy and International law, International speciali zed Book service Inc, November, 1985
10)NPT review conference, NPT/conf2000 28, final document of the 2000 review conference of the parties to the npt 24 may 2000, p3
11)NPtReview conference, npt/cont 2000/28 final dovument of 2000 review conference of the parties to the NPT24 may 2000
12)Pelzer, de, Norbert, the nature and scope of international coopration in connection with the peace ful uses of atomic energy and its limits an assessment, 1981.
13)RockWood, laura, /ega/ interuments related to the application of the safe guords 1998,2000
14)Rupert Ticehurst, the martens clause and the laws of armed conflict international review of the red cross (IRRC) no, 317 march, april1997
15)Statue of IAEA, art2
16)Sloss, David, It”s not broken, so don’t fixit, the IAEA safe guards system and the NPT Virginia journal of international law volume 35, issue, 4,1995,p856
17)Shanker. Mohamed, the nuclear non- prolife ration treaty origin and implementation 1959-1979-1980 p338)IAEA, Board of governors, gov/ inf/ 824, technical cooperation strategy 1997,p1.
18)Stockholm. Declaration, 1972, principle,21 rio declaration, 1992, principle2.
19) The Role of the IAEA in the Development of International law 1989 Nordic journal of international /a/, Vol 58.
20)Year book of inter national law commission 1980, part2
21)www.aftab.ir
22) www.beheshnet.blogfa.p59
23)www.bashgah,net
24) www.bkbc.co.u/persian.iran/story2004/9/printable/040907/a-atomic-irannot-text-shtml.
25)www.csr.ir
26) http://www.fas.org.nuke
27)http://www.fas.org.nuke
28)http://www.fas.org.nuke)
29)www.hawzah.net
30)www.habilian.ir
31)www.idsp.ir
32)www.irtt.ir
33)www.iran.ir
34)www.irannuelear.net
35) http://www.iaea.org
36)www.mjdocument.ir
37)www.mehrnews.com
38) http://www.opanal.org/opanal
39)www.politicedu.parsiblog.com
40)www.seemab.ir
41)www.tabnak.ir
key word:Nuclear power -Transmition-Peaseful-Nuclear technology-International law
Abstract
The emergence of new phenomena is the result of human innovation accelerates in the Twentieth century occurred this type of technology to organize and regulate the procedures For applying them and exploit them efficiently is essential there fore we have always been The discovery of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to military use and the lawyers and Politicians have been
Although the military application of nuclear phenomena condemned by the international Community and the international community is willing to repeat the traumatic experience of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
On the one hand to preserve the monopoly of the nuclear powers and the efforts of Developing countries to achieve this field of nuclear energy political clashes has opened join The IAEA and join the non prolife ration treaty safe guards agreements and additional Protocols depends including measures to regulate the use of nuclear energy are evaluated This is to ensure the peaceful uses of nuclear energy will be diverted to use in nuclear Weapons program will not but despite the undeniable legal source in the field of peaceful Uses of nuclear energy as an inalienable right of all countries to have nuclear states used in The normalization of their legal non prolife ration of nuclear technology and nuclear weapons Under the juise of non prolife ration closely and illegal constrainst in developing peaceful Uses of atomic energy many positive impact on the lives of nuclear technology an san handed Yet available or not affordable for all countries nuclear techniques in developing countries Trough the international Atomic energy agency technical cooperative programs or often Through bilateral have access cooperation with developing countries
(پیوست د)
statute of IAEA, art2 ↑
.Paulom. Barrton- IAEA Technical cooperation, IAEA Buneten, vol37, No1,1995 ↑
